By Albert Nxumalo

Theย  Mediaย  Alliance ofย  Zimbabweย  (MAZ) has expressed grave disappointment over amendments of theย  Zimbabwe Media Commission Bill saying they are inadequate and fall far short of the expectations of media stakeholders and citizens.

MAZ said Zimbabwe cannot afford to recline back on the reform agenda insisting that only genuine democratic reforms can break the country out of its dark history. 

Government,ย  under the spotlight,ย  toย  implementย  genuineย  media reforms,ย  in December last year through the Ministryย  ofย  Information,ย  Publicityย  andย  Broadcastingย  Services gazettedย  threeย  amendments,ย  oneย  thatย  seeksย  toย  clarifyย  theย  reporting requirementsย  byย  theย  ZMCย  toย  theย  Executiveย  asย  definedย  inย  Sectionย  323ย  ofย  the Constitution

The other amendment aim is to give effect to co-regulation while another corrects a wording error from the gazetted ZMC Bill. 

“It is disappointing to note that none of the amendments addresses the concerns raised by media stakeholders and citizens,” MAZ said in a statement.

“Inย essence, the amendment does not inย anyย way addressย theย contentiousย issuesย aroundย provisionsย thatย criminaliseย journalismย andย by extensionย freedomย ofย expression, theย involvementย ofย theย policeย inย professional investigationsย andย clausesย thatย compromiseย theย independenceย ofย theย ZMC,ย astandardย prescribedย inย theย Constitution,ย amongย otherย issuesย tabledย before the Ministry and theย  Parliamentaryย  Portfolioย  Committee onย  Media”.

Detailing its displeasure, the media body said it  is  further  regrettable  that  government  chose  to  take  a  minimalist  approach  in  giving effect  to  co-regulation  by  merely  extracting  Constitutional  provisions  that  empower the  ZMC  to  delegate  some  of  โ€œits  functions  under  section  249  (1)(e)  and  2  to any regulatory  body  for  media  practitioners  set  up  under  the  law.โ€  

 “This delegation can be extended  ‘to any other person any other duty, power or function under this (ZMC) Act; expect the power to delegate in terms of this section,” MAZ argued.  

While the provisions appear to be providing the way for the realisation of a co-regulatory framework for the media, MAZ said the vagueness of the provision suggests that the self-regulatory mechanism envisaged in co-regulation will operate at the pleasure of the statutory body.  

“This entrenchment of statutory regulation or token co-regulation goes against the well-documented demands of media stakeholders,  the general views of the citizens and is not in sync with the African Charter on Human and Peopleโ€™s Rights (ACHPR) Declaration on Freedom of Expression,  which Zimbabwe is party to. 

 “The  Minister and senior government officials have on numerous occasions reiterated that government is in support of co-regulation.     It is thus deplorable that government would miss an opportunity to  โ€œwalk the talkโ€  by enacting provisions that would give effect to co-regulation within the context of the ZMC Bill”.

Media players have for long maintained that co-regulation will decriminalize the profession and allow the media industry to control its professional standards.

Going forward, MAZ appealed to the government andย  Parliament to reconsider the amendments and take into cognisance the views expressed by the media and citizens.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *