Former Speaker of Parliament Lovemore Moyo has advocated for direct dialogue between Gukurahundi victims and the government, urging activists to engage with key figures within Zanu PF.
He believes that such engagement is crucial for addressing the legacy of the Gukurahundi atrocities.
Moyo stated that the Gukurahundi genocide is not merely a regional issue but a national concern that necessitates a comprehensive resolution.
He said discussions must include Zanu PF, despite the challenges posed by potential co-optation within the party.
“We need to make them understand the importance of resolving this matter,” he said, reinforcing that Gukurahundi is fundamentally a national problem, not just one affecting Matabeleland.
Moyo cautioned that excluding the State from these discussions would hinder progress. He reflected on past dialogues that have led to significant advancements, stating, “If we don’t do that then we would have failed as this particular generation.”
He also expressed concern over internal divisions within Zanu PF that complicate engagement efforts.
Recalling his earlier activism, Moyo noted his transformation from radicalism to a more collaborative approach. “That’s why people will say Lovemore Moyo is a sellout because we began to accept that we have to work with them,” he explained. He shared experiences from his past with fellow activists and how they successfully engaged with Zanu PF members.
Moyo called for strategic conversations with influential Zanu PF figures, citing historical examples where dialogue has led to progress in other contexts. He stated, “ANC worked with the Whites… what I am suggesting is we need to make them understand the importance of resolving this matter.”
He acknowledged the emotional toll of Gukurahundi on victims and urged for a shift away from anger towards constructive dialogue. “I want us to think outside the box,” he said, stressing that maintaining a mindset of defeat would only perpetuate suffering.
Moyo’s call for engagement comes amidst ongoing debates regarding effective methods to confront Gukurahundi’s legacy. He expressed scepticism towards proposed public hearings led by traditional leaders but called for communication with all stakeholders involved.
“We need to talk to provincial ministers and other people… it’s not a wise decision” to avoid conversations with those in power.”
